Absent Duties in Educational Research: Synthesis Research As a Model
This article highlights some of the absent duties in educational research. The most important of these is the neglect of the synthesis research, which represents a bridging of the research gap and the addition of our knowledge on a subject by creating generalizations and serious attempts to resolve conflicts in the literature. This article attempts to distinguish between the term synthesis research and related terms. The article focuses on the division of literature reviews: the Characteristic, categories, and the evolution of the concept of structural research, its stages and Conclusion.
Chalmers, I., V. Hedges, L. & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 25(1), 12-37.
Cochran, W. (1954). The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics, 10(1), 101-129.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cook, T., Cooper, H., Cordray, D., Hartmann, H., Hedges, L., Light, R., Louis, T. & Mosteller, F. (1992). Meta-analysis for explanation: A casebook. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Cooper, H. (1982). Scientiﬁc guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291-302.
Cooper, H. (1987). Literature searching strategies of integrative research reviewers: A first survey. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8, 372-383.
Cooper, H. (1988). Organizing knowledge synthesis: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1, 104-126.
Cooper, H. (2007). Evaluating and interpreting research syntheses in adult learning and literacy. Boston, Mass.: National College Transition Network, New England Literacy Resource Center/World Education, Inc.
Cooper, H. (2009). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Cooper, H. & Hedges, L. (2009). Research synthesis as a scientific process. In H. Cooper; L. Hedges & J. Valentine (Eds.), Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.), (pp.3-16). New York: Russell Sage Foundation
Feldman, K. (1971). Using the work of others: Some observations on reviewing and integrating. Sociology of Education, 4(1), 86-102.
Fisher, R. (1932). Statistical methods for research workers (4th ed.). London: Oliver & Boyd.
Glass, G. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
Glass, G., McGaw, B. & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Hedges, L. & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, Fl.: Academic Press.
Hedges, L. (1987). How hard is hard science, how soft is soft science?” American Psychologist, 42(5), 443-455.
Hunter, J., Schmidt, F. & Jackson, G. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating research findings across studies. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Hunter, J. & Schmidt, F. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Jackson, G. (1980). Methods for integrative reviews. Review of Educational Research, 50, 438–60.
Johnson, B. (1993). DSTAT: Software for the meta-analytic review of research. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Light, R. & Smith, P. (1971). Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among research studies. Harvard Educational Review, 41(4), 429-471.
Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Manten, A. (1973). Scientiﬁc Literature Review. Scholarly Publishing, 5, 75-89.
Mosteller, F. & Bush, R. (1954). Selected quantitative techniques. In Gardner Lindzey (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology: Theory and Method, Vol. 1. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Olkin, I. (1990). History and Goals. In Kenneth W. & Miron L. (eds.), The future of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Pearson, K. (1904). Report on certain enteric fever innoculation statistics. British Medical Journal, 3, 1243-1246.
Rosenthal, R. & Rubin, D. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: The first 345 studies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 377-386.
Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Shadish, W. D. Cook, T. & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, Mass.: Houghton Mifﬂin.
Smith, M. & Glass, G. (1977). Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist, 32(9), 752-760.
Taveggia, T. (1974). Resolving research controversy through empirical cumulation: Toward reliable sociological knowledge. Sociological Methods & Research, 2(4): 395-407.
Tippett, L. (1931). The methods of statistics. London: Williams & Norgate.
Wachter, K. & Straf, M. (1990)(eds.). The future of meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wolf, F. (1986). Meta-analysis: quantitative methods for research synthesis. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Copyright (c) 2018 Saleh Mohamed Saleh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC
Creative Commons Rights Expression Language (CC REL)