Meta-Analysis of the Behavioral and Cognitive Effects of Interactive Video Games on K-12 Students
Abstract
ABSTRACT
A meta-analysis of the effects of Interactive Video Games (IVGs) on the behavioral and cognitive constructs of meta-cognitive knowledge, direct cognition, and regulatory skills of K-12 students was conducted using a qualitative approach based on grounded theory to address the subject of inquiry within formalized frameworks. Research results showed that a significant number of articles supported the position that IVGs help students to improve the foundations of their procedural, conditional, and declarative knowledge, with a smaller number contending otherwise. A systematic literature review, analysis of thematic content, and organization of themes led to the conclusion that IVGs have several positive and some negative effects. The positive effects include the acquisition of skills for continual development of hypothetical skills, self-regulation, better task performance (based on declarative and procedural knowledge), higher levels of concentration, improved reasoning and judgmental capabilities, increased physical arousal and competitiveness, and positive changes in attitude and behavior. Using proper intervention strategies could enhance the positive gains from IVGs. Nevertheless, it is recommended to conduct further research to determine the best strategies to optimize the positive effects of games and reduce their negative effects among K-12 school children.
Keywords: Meta-Analysis, Behavior, Cognition, Interactive Video Games
Downloads
References
• Anderson, C. A., & Dill, K. E. (2000). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings, and behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 772.
• Bartholow, B. D., & Anderson, C. A. (2002). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior: Potential sex differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(3), 283–290.
• Blumberg, F. C., & Sokol, L. M. (2004). Boys' and girls' use of cognitive strategy when learning to play video games. The Journal of General Psychology, 131(2), 151–158.
• Buckley, K. E., & Anderson, C. A. (2006). A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games. Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, 1(1) 363–378.
• Carnagey, N. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2005). The effects of reward and punishment in violent video games on aggressive affect, cognition, and behavior. Psychological Science, 16(11), 882–889.
• Connolly, T. M., Boyle, E. A., MacArthur, E., Hainey, T., & Boyle, J. M. (2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661–686.
• Ferguson, C. J. (2010). Blazing Angels or Resident Evil? Can violent video games be a force for good? Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 68.
• Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Linder, J. R., & Walsh, D. A. (2004). The effects of violent video game habits on adolescent hostility, aggressive behaviors, and school performance. Journal of Adolescence, 27(1), 5–22.
• Gravetter, F., & Forzano, L. A. (2015). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Cengage Learning.
• Grigorovici, D. M., & Constantin, C. D. (2004). Experiencing interactive advertising beyond rich media: Impacts of ad type and presence on brand effectiveness in 3D gaming immersive virtual environments. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 5(1), 22–36.
• Kato, P. M. (2010). Video games in health care: Closing the gap. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 113.
• Ke, F. (2008). Computer games application within alternative classroom goal structures: cognitive, metacognitive, and affective evaluation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(5-6), 539–556.
• Kirsh, S. J. (2003). The effects of violent video games on adolescents: The overlooked influence of development. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 8(4), 377–389.
• Koedinger, K. R., Brunskill, E., Baker, R. S., McLaughlin, E. A., & Stamper, J. (2013). New potentials for data-driven intelligent tutoring system development and optimization. AI Magazine, 34(3), 27–41.
• Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326.
• Ogletree, S. M., & Drake, R. (2007). College students’ video game participation and perceptions: Gender differences and implications. Sex Roles, 56(7-8), 537–542.
• Parra, L., & Guild, G. G. D. (2015). From Exploration to the Birth of a New Industry. Video Games Around the World, 137.
• Rhodes, R. E., Warburton, D. E., & Bredin, S. S. (2009). Predicting the effect of interactive video bikes on exercise adherence: An efficacy trial. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 14(6), 631–640.
• Scandura, T. A., & Williams, E. A. (2000). Research methodology in management: Current practices, trends, and implications for future research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1248–1264.
• Shea, P. (2000). Leveling the playing field: A study of captioned interactive video for second language learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(3), 243–263.
• Sherry, J. L. (2001). The effects of violent video games on aggression. Human Communication Research, 27(3), 409–431.
• Skoric, M. M., Teo, L. L. C., & Neo, R. L. (2009). Children and video games: addiction, engagement, and scholastic achievement. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(5), 567–572.
• Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulation, 2(1), 49–62.
• Squire, K. (2006). From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher, 35(8), 19–29.
• Staiano, A. E., & Calvert, S. L. (2011). Exergames for physical education courses: Physical, social, and cognitive benefits. Child Development Perspectives, 5(2), 93–98.
• Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., & Gross, E. (2001). The impact of computer use on children's and adolescents' development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22(1), 7–30.
• Thomas, J. R., Silverman, S., & Nelson, J. (2015). Research Methods in Physical Activity, 7E.London: Human Kinetics.
• Van Reijmersdal, E. A., Jansz, J., Peters, O., & Van Noort, G. (2010). The effects of interactive brand placements in online games on children’s cognitive, affective, and conative brand responses. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1787–1794.
• Wellington, J. (2015). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775.
Copyright (c) 2018 Uthman turki Alturki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License: CC BY-NC
Creative Commons Rights Expression Language (CC REL)