The Impact of Cognitive Activation Practices on Enhancing Student Mathematical Reasoning in Mathematical Literacy: A Causal Comparative Study Based on PISA 2022

  • Amal Saleh Alghaeth PhD Mathematics Education Candidate, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Amalalghaeth@outlook.com
  • Maha Ibrahim Alomiear PhD Mathematics Education Candidate, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, alomermaha@gmail.com
  • Hanan Saleh Alnuaim PhD Mathematics Education Candidate, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, 445204948@student.ksu.edu.sa
  • Samar Abdulaziz Alshalhob Professor of Mathematics Education, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, salshalhoub@ksu.edu.sa
Keywords: teaching quality, effective teaching, international assessments, cognitive activation, mathematical literacy

Abstract

This study aimed to describe and compare cognitive activation practices designed to enhance students' mathematical reasoning in Saudi Arabia (KSA), the United States (USA), the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and Singapore. It also explored the impact of these practices on students' mathematical literacy development in each country. Using a causal-comparative methodology, the research examined student scores from the PISA 2022 mathematical literacy assessments, alongside responses to specific questionnaire items on teachers' cognitive activation practices aimed at fostering mathematical reasoning. The findings revealed statistically significant differences in the implementation of cognitive activation practices across the countries studied. Saudi Arabia demonstrated significantly lower levels of these practices compared to the other nations, while the UAE exhibited significantly higher levels. No statistically significant differences were observed between the USA and Singapore in this regard. Moreover, the results indicated that all cognitive activation practices had a predictive effect on the variance in mathematical literacy among students in each country\. Notably, certain practices exhibited a negative impact on mathematical literacy in some countries while contributing positively in others.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Ghaith, A. S., & Al-Ruwais, A. M. (2022). Waʿy muʿallimāt al-riyāḍiyyāt fī al-marḥalah al-mutawassiṭah bil-thaqāfah al-riyāḍiyyah wafq iṭār al-barnāmaj al-duwalī li-taqyīm al-ṭalabah (PISA) wa-ʿalāqatuhu bi-mumārasātihinna al-tadrīsiyyah (Risālat mājistīr ghayr manshūrah). Kulliyyat al-Tarbiyah, Jāmiʿat al-Malik Suʿūd, Al-Riyāḍ. (In Arabic).

Al-Harbi, M. S. (October, 2020). Mustawá al-thaqāfah al-riyāḍiyyah al-muktasabah ladá al-ṭullāb al-saʿūdiyyīn fī dirāsat al-barnāmaj al-duwalī li-taqwīm al-ṭalabah (PISA 2018) fī ḍawʾ baʿḍ al-mutaghayyirāt. Al-Majallah al-Saʿūdiyyah lil-ʿUlūm al-Tarbawiyyah, (68), 31-51. (in Arabic).

Al-Majlis al-Qawmī li-Muʿallimī al-Riyāḍiyyāt (NCTM). (2014). Min al-mabādiʾ ilá al-ijrāʾāt: Ḍamān al-najāḥ al-riyāḍī lil-jamīʿ. (N. M. Al-Omari, Trans.). Al-Riyāḍ: Dār Jāmiʿat Suʿūd lil-Nashr. (In Arabic).

Al-Sarhani, M. M. (2024). Mumārasāt muʿallimī al-riyāḍiyyāt al-dāʿimah li-tanmiyat al-mahārāt al-riyāḍiyyah ladá ṭalabat al-marḥalah al-mutawassiṭah wafq iṭār al-barnāmaj al-duwalī li-taqyīm al-ṭalabah "PISA, 2022". Majallat Jāmiʿat al-Malik ʿAbd al-ʿAzīz - al-Ādāb wa-al-ʿUlūm al-Insāniyyah, 2, 197-245. (In Arabic).

Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A.,... Tsai, Y. M. (2010). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 1, pp. 133–180. doi:https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.2307/40645421

Bolhuis, S. (2003). Towards process-oriented teaching for self-directed lifelong learning: A multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 3, pp. 327-347. doi:https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00008-7

Cantley, I., Prendergast, M., & Schlindwein, F. (2017). Collaborative cognitive-activation strategies as an emancipatory force in promoting girls’ interest in and enjoyment of mathematics: A cross-national case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 81, 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.11.004.

Demir, S. B. (2018). The Effect of Teaching Quality and Teaching Practices on PISA 2012 Mathematics Achievement of Turkish Students. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4, pp. 645-658. doi:DOI: 10.21449/ijate.463409

Elliott, J., Stankov, L., Lee, J., & Beckmann, F. J. (2018). What did PISA and TIMSS ever do for us? The potential of large-scale datasets for understanding and improving educational practice. Comparative Education, 1, pp. 133-155. doi:https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1545386

Förtsch, S., Werner, L., Kotzebue & Birgit, j. (2016) Effects of biology teachers’ professional knowledge and cognitive activation on students’ achievement, International Journal of Science Education, 38:17, 2642-2666, DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2016.1257170

Herreras, E. (2017). Risk low math performance PISA 2012: Impact of assistance to Early Childhood Education and other possible cognitive variables. Psychological Research Records, 7, 2606–2617.

Hwang, J., Choi, K. M., Bae, Y., & Shin, D. H. (2018). Do Teachers’ Instructional Practices Moderate Equity in Mathematical and Scientific Literacy?: An Investigation of the PISA 2012 and 2015. Int J of Sci and Math Educ, pp. 25-45. doi:https://doi-org.sdl.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9909-8

Klieme, E., Pauli, C., & Reusser, K. (2009). The Pythagoras study: Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms. The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom, pp. 137-160.

Le Donné, N., Fraser, P., & Bousquet, G. (2016). Teaching Strategies for Instructional Quality Insights from the TALIS-PISA Link Data. OECD Education Working Papers. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jln1hlsr0lr-en.

Li, H., Liu, J., Zhang, D., & Liu, H. (2021). Examining the relationships between cognitive activation, self-efficacy, socioeconomic status, and achievement in mathematics: A multi-level analysis. Education Psychology, 91(1), 101-126.

Liu, S., Lu, J., & Yin, H. (2022). Can professional learning communities promote teacher innovation? A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103571.

Martain, H. (2007). Mathematical Literacy. Principal Leadership: Middle Level Edition, 5, pp. 28-31.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework. In PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/7ea9ee19-en

OECD. (2023, 12 5). PISA 2022 Results: Factsheets Saudi Arabia. Retrieved from OECD: https://www.oecd.org/publication/pisa-2022-results/country-notes/saudi-arabia-f69c2e4b#chapter-d1e11

OECD. (n.d.). 6 Sample Design. Retrieved from PISA 2022 Technical Report: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2022technicalreport/PISA-2022-Technical-Report-Ch-6-PISA-Sample-Design.pdf

OECD. (n.d.). Report 19 Scaling procedures and construct validation of context questionnaire data. Retrieved from PISA 2022 Technical: https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2022technicalreport/PISA-2022-Technical-Report-Ch-19-PISA-Scaling-Procedures-Construct-Validation-Context-Questionnaire-Data.pdf

Tourón, J., Navarro-Asencio, E., Lizasoain, L., López-González, E., & Pedro, M. G.-S. (2019). How teachers’ practices and students’ attitudes towards technology affect mathematics achievement: results and insights from PISA 2012. 3, pp. 263-275. doi:DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2018.1424927

Yi, H. S., & Lee, Y. (2017). A latent profile analysis and structural equation modeling of the instructional quality of mathematics classrooms based on the PISA 2012 results of Korea and Singapore. Asia Pacific Educ, pp. 23-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9455-4

Published
2024-09-15
How to Cite
Alghaeth, A., Alomiear, M., Alnuaim, H., & Alshalhob, S. (2024). The Impact of Cognitive Activation Practices on Enhancing Student Mathematical Reasoning in Mathematical Literacy: A Causal Comparative Study Based on PISA 2022. International Journal of Research in Educational Sciences., 7(4), 227 - 256. Retrieved from https://iafh.net/index.php/IJRES/article/view/481
Section
Articles