Measuring the Degree of Effectiveness of the Activities in the Eighth-Grade Mathematics Textbook Content from the Perspective of Teachers

  • Muneer Jebreel Karama Palestine Polytechnic University

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the effectiveness of sports activities included in the mathematics textbook for the eighth grade from the perspective of the teachers who implemented these activities during their teaching process. To achieve the study's goal, the researcher reviewed educational literature and extracted the theoretical framework for this study. This was also utilized in designing the research tool, which is a questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. After implementing validity procedures, the final number of items was 23 out of an initial 27 items. The reliability coefficient, according to Cronbach's alpha, was 0.841, which is suitable for the purposes of the study and research.
The study sample consisted of 72 teachers from government, UNRWA, and private schools in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The sample was chosen intentionally through the voluntary response of the participants to the questionnaire items. The results of the study showed varying degrees of effectiveness regarding the activities included in the mathematics textbook from the teachers' perspectives. There were no statistically significant differences attributed to the variables of gender and years of experience. However, there were statistically significant differences based on the type of supervising authority, favoring government and UNRWA schools over private schools. Based on the study results, the researcher recommended increasing the effectiveness of some activities that were below the mean score on the five-point Likert scale.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 52(3), 215-241.

Biggs, J. B. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Billstein, R., Libeskind, S., & Lott, J. W. (2013). Problem Solving Approach to Mathematics for Elementary School Teachers, A: Pearson New International Edition. Pearson Higher Ed.

Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia journal of mathematics, science & technology education, 5(3).

Cooke, B. D., & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical communication in the classroom: A teacher makes a difference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(6), 365-369.

Deal, L. J., & Wismer, M. G. (2010). NCTM principles and standards for mathematically talented students. Gifted Child Today, 33(3), 55-65.

Fischbein, E. (1994). The interaction between the formal, the algorithmic and the intuitive components in a mathematical activity. Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline, 231-245.

Goh, D. Y., & Jacob, A. (2012). Perception of picky eating among children in Singapore and its impact on caregivers: a questionnaire survey. Asia Pacific family medicine, 11(1), 5.

Greenes, C., Ginsburg, H. P., & Balfanz, R. (2004). Big math for little kids. Early childhood research quarterly, 19(1), 159-166.

Gresalfi, M. S., Barnes, J., & Cross, D. (2012). When does an opportunity become an opportunity? Unpacking classroom practice through the lens of ecological psychology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1-2), 249-267.

Lampert, M., Beasley, H., Ghousseini, H., Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2010). Using designed instructional activities to enable novices to manage ambitious mathematics teaching. In Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 129-141). Springer, Boston, MA.

Lesh, R. A., & Lamon, S. J. (Eds.). (2013). Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics. Routledge.

Lubienski, S. T. (2000). Problem solving as a means toward mathematics for all: An exploratory look through a class lens. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 454-482.

Ozmantar, M.F. (2017). A historical analysis of primary mathematics curricula in terms ofteaching principles. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES),3(2), 327-342. DOI: 10.21890/ijres.327890

Pape, S. J. (2004). Middle school children's problem-solving behavior: A cognitive analysis from a reading comprehension perspective. Journal for research in Mathematics Education, 187-219.

Schoenfeld, A. (2009). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. Colección Digital Eudoxus, (7).

Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American educational research journal, 33(2), 455-488.

Published
2024-09-15
How to Cite
Karama, M. (2024). Measuring the Degree of Effectiveness of the Activities in the Eighth-Grade Mathematics Textbook Content from the Perspective of Teachers. International Journal of Research in Educational Sciences., 7(4), 191 - 226. Retrieved from https://iafh.net/index.php/IJRES/article/view/479
Section
Articles